Hello
everyone, this is my interview with my very dear friend Louis. Like Abby
mentioned with her interviewee I obviously knew which side of this policy Louis
would agree with because he is homosexual. Louis opened my eyes to why it is
truly important for gay marriage to be considered valid federally in this
country. Many people think that fighting for gay marriage is just to appease
homosexual men and women so they can choose who they love and love freely; it
goes way beyond that. Louis made me realize that instead of placing obstacles
in the path of gay couples; it seems that the smarter, more better alternative
from a societal perspective would be to encourage monogamy and stability
amongst relationships that is what the true sanctity of marriage is about.
I believe
that gay marriage is a matter of injustice. To put it in context: imagine if
tomorrow, Congress enacted a law denying African-Americans the right to raise children
together in a legally protected relationship. Or if by act of law, Hispanic and
Jewish couples who had lived together for years would no longer be permitted to
file their tax returns together, be under their spouses’ health insurance, or
legally share a house together. Don’t you think there would be civil OUTRAGE? So, my question is why do we not feel this way
about homosexual couples? Isn’t their struggle a matter of civic injustice?
-Lauren
Is this a
problem you think is important? Why/ Why
not?
Of course
this problem is important. As a gay male, I have struggled with my identity my
whole life and it took me a long time to be comfortable with being who I am.
Now that I have the courage to love freely, it hurts me knowing that my love will
never be acknowledged or valued by our government. Gay marriage is at the
forefront of the civil rights movement at this point in time and I hope that I will
one day be recognized by the federal government and have the same rights
regarding my relationship as everyone else.
Do you think
others in our community this is an important problem? why/ why not?
Of course I think
this is a problem, and it is something that I deal with every day. Thankfully my
family, friends, and the people that I surround myself with are for gay marriage.
The PROBLEM is that gay marriage opponents go on to conclude their points with these
‘end of the world’ visions of the moral decay of our nation. A lot of people
believe that legalizing gay marriage would threaten the sanctity of the
institution upon which our very society rests. But my point is that 50% of
marriages in the United State leads to divorce, so shouldn’t we respect a
person’s choice to marry freely and instead of pushing for man-woman marriage
why can’t we push for a person taking upon themselves the true ‘sanctity’ of
marriage and the responsibilities.
What policy,
if any, does government now have to deal with this problem?
Our government
has allotted each state to decide to legally recognize gay marriage, however
the federal government will not consider gay marriage as being valid.
What are advantages of this policy?
There are SO
MANY ADVANTAGES! If gay marriage is recognized legally by the federal government,
I as a gay man will be granted the rights as every straight marriage which
includes: The right to spousal benefits guaranteed to public employees,
including health insurance, life insurance and disability payments, plus
similar contractual benefits for private sector employees. I will also be
granted Priority in being appointed guardian of an incapacitated spouse or in
being recognized as acting for an incapacitated spouse in making health care
decisions.
What are
disadvantages of this policy?
There are no disadvantages of this policy. The
real problem is that conservatives are against gay marriage because they against
gays, not because they care about the sanctity of marriage.
How might
the policy be improved?
This
policy needs to amend rights to gays, and to also make us recognize gays
legally. It also needs to make Americans believe that making gay marriage legal
is not just for gays, it is for every race, every sex, and every person who has
been discriminated against.
What
disagreements, if any, about the policy exist in this community?
There are
many disagreements concerning gay marriage, most of these are made by religious
conservatives. I will try to explain briefly these issues that they have with
ME.
1. Gay
marriage promotes promiscuity: My thought is how ironic are gays being labeled promiscuous
when we want our STABLE RELATIONSHIP to be considered valid.
2. Gay
marriage corrupts morals and depletes the sanctity of marriage: So you are
telling me that marrying someone that I have been with for over five years,
have a stable and solid respectable relationship with, and I am madly in love
with is considered corrupt; but Kim Kardashian’s 72 day marriage to a dude she
barely knows is respectable and considered valid???? Why can’t we start accepting
REAL relationships as valid and start being concerned with quickie Las Vegas
style marriages that last for 2 days?
Where can I
get more information about this problem and the different positions people take
on this problem?
Human Rights
Campaign-www.hrc.org
Marriage Equality Project- www.marriageequality.org/meusa
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Network-www.lambdalegal.org
Marriage Equality Project- www.marriageequality.org/meusa
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Network-www.lambdalegal.org
No comments:
Post a Comment